MAY 15 - 31, 2003

VOL. 1 ISSUE 3

 

ON THE SERIOUS SIDE

PRESIDENT BUSH'S GREAT DIPLOMATIC SUCCESS


It has been a common joke made about President George W. Bush.  The man is dumb, they say.  An idiot.  A bumbler.  Imbecile.

 

It is also the general perception that President Bush failed miserably in his diplomatic efforts prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He should have been able to get the world on board, that line of thought goes. 

 

These arguments both rely on the idea that not getting the world on board for Operation Iraqi Freedom was a failure on the part of Bush.  He had claimed again and again that he would prefer to have the UN with him, even if he would do it with just a small "coalition of the willing" if necessary.  So it seems he wanted to get the world united in this cause, but failed.

 

We at The Moderate Independent are sorry to break it to the world, but 1) Bush did not fail in his diplomatic efforts regarding Iraq, he succeeded brilliantly in achieving his goal, and 2) the man is no dummy - in fact, far from it; President Bush is one of the most cunning, politically brilliant men to occupy the White House in decades.

 

AND, the whole idea of him being a dummy or a bumbler is just something he puts out there to serve a purpose.

 

All along it seemed that Bush was possibly inept diplomatically, and that's why the multinational coalition didn't form and UN resolutions failed.  The reality is, that President Bush never wanted the support of France, Germany, Russia, and the UN. In fact, he wanted to avoid having it at all costs.

 

Failure to get the UN resolution was not a failure for him but a success.  As you saw him and Prime Minister Tony Blair stand side by side during the war, Blair would talk about getting the UN involved in rebuilding Iraq.  President Bush, however, would stand right there beside him and make clear he didn't want the UN involved under any circumstances.
 

Before even the first week of the war was over, Vice President Dick Cheney's old company, Haliburton, was given a $400+ million dollar contract - they said it was for putting out the 7 oil fires that were burning.  As we now know, Haliburton has also been given control of pumping and distributing Iraq's oil for the foreseeable future (see CNN story).  All of this was given to Dick Cheney's old company during just the first week of the war, in, as is no secret, a secret, closed "bidding" process (see CNN story).

 

All along the Republicans had been saying, "Well, France, Russia and Germany are just hurting themselves.  They'll be regretting not going along with the war when the oil contracts and rebuilding contracts go out afterwards and they are left out."

 

As we have often heard, President Bush is frequently underestimated.  While the country and the world labeled him diplomatically inept, he was really very adeptly pretending to be diplomatically inept, while really achieving exactly what he, Cheney, et. al wanted - to not have to share.  We can do this alone, they said.  And in their hearts and minds they felt that since we would be doing most of the fighting anyway - even with a UN resolution supporting the war - why share the spoils?

 

It is time to give credit where it is due.  President Bush is an amazing statesman.  He gives the impression of trying to do the right thing but failing, when really he is accomplishing exactly what he wanted, and yet looking as if he tried to do the right thing.  He gets to look like his heart was in the right place, and France and Germany and Russia take heat from the American people for being so difficult and weak.
 

The reality is President Bush did everything possible to ensure that winning their support for the war would be impossible.  The UN won't be involved in the rebuild or oil distribution, France, Germany, and Russia won't.

 

Just Bush, Cheney, and their Texas oil buddies will reap the multi, multi-billion dollar windfall that all this blood will reap. (see CNN story)

 

Whether the war was justified or not for the sake of national security, this forcing us to go it alone solely for the purpose of keeping the contracts and cash all for Bush's friends is truly one of the most heinously amoral things we at The Moderate Independent have ever known.  It has been truly horrible to sit and watch our President drive a wedge between us and all of our allies - even Britain - to maintain control of the money.  President Bush and his administration even stooped to running a "smear campaign," as the French are calling it, planting false stories about French diplomats giving out passports in Syria  - which even the Bush administration admits now were false (see Washington Post story) - and the French supplying weapons to Iraq - another thing we all heard that now the administration admits is false.
 

We at The Moderate Independent never bought the "blood for oil" talk.  It seemed the war truly was for national security reasons.  But when you start looking at the realities of Operation Iraqi Freedom, you have to start questioning.  The first U.S. Marine to die died securing an oil field.  The first task accomplished was securing oil fields.  Even during President Bush's address to the nation on the eve of war, when he said he had a message for the Iraqi troops, before he said not to use chemical weapons, before he said not to commit atrocities, the first thing he said to them, with all of America and the world watching, was, "Do not destroy oil wells, a source of wealth that belongs to the Iraqi people."  Before saying don't use weapons of mass destruction.

 

Can't imagine that is true?  Here is the full quote (you can read the full text of the speech on the government's own website):

"And all Iraqi military and civilian personnel should listen carefully to this warning. In any conflict, your fate will depend on your action. Do not destroy oil wells, a source of wealth that belongs to the Iraqi people. Do not obey any command to use weapons of mass destruction against anyone, including the Iraqi people. War crimes will be prosecuted. War criminals will be punished. And it will be no defense to say, "I was just following orders."" 

As we have said, we believe the mission of removing Saddam Hussein as a threat is one of the main reasons Operation Iraqi Freedom was undertaken.  But there seems to be only one reason we are in this endeavor alone, having to use more American troops, spending more American taxpayer money, and destroying a world order and alliances that were decades in the making:  to keep all of the rebuilding money and power over future oil contracts within the Bush/Cheney Huston-based Axis of Oil buddies.



 

 

   

MAIN PAGE

 

NEWS

Bush, Rove Start Planning Who to Blame, Bomb When 9/11 of Global Warming Hits

 

Democrats Court The Asshole Vote

 

Democrats, Shocked And Awed As Gingrich Calls Bush's Role In War An "Unrelenting Defeat", Hire Him As New Spokesman

EDITORIAL

MEDIA WATCH

Australian Owned Fox News, USA Today, NY Post Push "True American Agenda"

HISTORICAL
George Pissed About French Interference With War

WORLD

Northrop, Occidental To Sponsor Shakira's Columbian Tour

AWARDS

PREVIOUS ISSUES

POLLS

Has President Bush Kept His Promise To Be a “Uniter, Not a Divider?”

LINKS

CONTACT US

 


PREVIOUS ARTICLES

Vol. 1 Issue 2

The Moderate Independent Rates The Democratic Hopefuls Based On How Moderate And Independent They Are

 

MAIN PAGE