July 15 - 31, 2003

VOL. 1 ISSUE 7

 

UNRAVELING THE FAT TRAP:  PT. 1 IN A SERIES

TWO THINGS YOU CAN DO TO LOSE WEIGHT - THAT WILL SAVE YOU MONEY AS WELL

by Georgette W. Arthur

 

JULY 28, 2003 –  No, we are not going to say, "Eat less and exercise more."  Yes, that would be what some people call the simple reality, but in reality it is the overly simplified reality.

 

Those of us who grow larger than we are genetically disposed to do so not because of weakness, laziness, or ignorance, but because of the effects of the current American lifestyle.  People from other countries come here thin, and immediately begin to put on weight.  People from America go elsewhere, and immediately begin to lose weight.

 

There are many aspects to this.  This article is the first in a series that will unravel the various aspects of our culture that trap even the best of us into putting on pounds that threaten our health (we at The Moderate Independent don't care about the looks aspect of things - I personally have known many beautiful people who had a few too many pounds.)

 

STEP 1

Simple.  Stop watching TV.

 

The reality is, if you just do this and don't consider any other change, and you are someone who is largely overweight, you will lose 20 to 30 pounds.

 

TV is not just another idle activity.  The difference between watching TV and other relatively idle activities, such as reading or playing cards, is enormous.

 

First of all, TV is entirely passive.  Reading at least requires mental activity.  Playing cards requires both mental and physical activity.  This may seem a minimal difference to you, but it is not.  And especially it is not when you take into consideration the second problem with TV.

 

In addition to keeping you completely sedentary, TV creates cravings.  All of those commercials make you hungry; that is their job.

 

When you are lost in a book or involved in a card game, you are not having consumption pushed on you.  Even if you eat while playing cards, you are being active, involved, and not having extra consumption sold to you in well-programmed ways.

 

Thirdly, TV is a hypnotic.

 

At the gym where I work out, there are TVs that line one side of the gym.  If you belong to a gym that is similar, stop and observe sometime.  People tend to do their exercise, take a little rest, and then exercise.  But when they get to a machine that faces a TV, they get lost, and can sit for four, five minutes, even longer between sets, as they are sucked into the TV's hypnotic glaze.

 

So simply, if you stop watching TV you will lose weight.  This is a tested fact.  And, since you may be able to cancel cable or satellite service, this can save you money as well.

 

STEP 2

This is my favorite, and very important.  When you go out to eat, always split a meal, rather than each person getting their own.

 

Much of the weight we Americans have put on over the last decade or so has been the result of the sales strategy of our restaurants.  The economic reality is that most of the cost of the meal you order lies in the overhead - the rent, utilities, staff pay.  The restaurant makes very little off of the first few dollars they charge for what you eat.

 

However, after that, it is largely profit.  So, for example, if they sell you a burger that is as big as you need, with a reasonable amount of french fries, they can get away with charging you maybe three or four dollars.  That will not yield them much profit, but mainly go toward overhead.

 

But, if they instead serve you a burger much larger than you need and much larger order of fries, they can charge you five or six dollars.  The fact that you don't need what they serve doesn't mean anything to them - the fact that they made pure profit off of that extra couple of dollars, with only negligible additional food cost, means everything.  And so they do this with all their meals, even the salads, and with the beverages, charging you $1.50 for a soda that costs them only 5 cents, and giving you more calories through free refills than you used to consume in an entire meal.

 

At this point in time, all meals are served big enough for at least two people.  We all stuff ourselves to finish what we are served, and in the process, get used to consuming more than we need or even really want.  And even after that, we have more left to bring home.

 

So, the question arises, why would you order two separate meals when one is more than enough for two?

 

For one thing, it will be healthier and help restore your sense of portion back to a healthy level if you split the meal instead of eating it all on your own.  And secondly, why spend twice the money just to increase your waistline - a double negative:  more money spent than necessary, and ruining your health by overeating and setting your accustomed appetite level to an unreasonably large portion.

 

Split the meal.  You will find it is much nicer to not get overstuffed, much cheaper to pay for only one meal, and kind of nice and intimate, to order together as a couple.

 

Two ideas, both of which not only cost nothing, but save you money, and both of which are guaranteed to reduce your weight (if you are overweight.)

 

Only one question remains:  why wouldn't you give one or both of these a try?  This would be the first step in unraveling the cultural tangle that leads so many of us - over 65 percent now - to be very overweight.

 

 

 

MAIN PAGE
 


ALL ISSUES

News

Battling Back: The Texas Three-step

FBI Called In To Look For Missing Tax Cut Windfall

Savage Weiner Roasted Due To Anti-gay Rant

Let's Get Something Straight: This New Breed Of Republican Is Pathetic

Republicans Begin To Cry Like Babies, Swear Like Bullies

"Pyrrhic Victory" Officially Renamed "Bush Victory"

AM Talk Host Savage Weiner Comes Out Of The Closet

Democrats Court The "Asshole Vote"

Democrats, Shocked And Awed As Gingrich Calls Bush's Role In War An "Unrelenting Defeat", Hire Him As New Spokesman

Like Father, Like Son: Bush To "Destabilize" Iran, Thinking It Will Somehow Stabilize Region

Why People Don't Belong To Either Party

On The Serious Side: President Bush's Great Diplomatic Success

Bush, Rove Start Planning Who to Blame, Bomb When 9/11 of Global Warming Arrives

Bush Admits He's Been Asking "Wrong Jesus" What He Would Do

Bush Hires Saddam's Information Minister

Could Bush Really Be To Blame For Ruining The Economy?

Democrats Suffering From 'SARS'

Is President Bush Being Exploitive, Landing "Top Gun" Style?

Santorum, Lott Sent Back To "Two-Shouldered" School

Tax Rate That Existed Throughout Booming Nineties Somehow Blamed For Current Downturn

Bush Thanks Osama, Saddam for Salvaging Republican Party

Schwarzenegger: "I'll make Bush Seem Like Mother Teresa"

Carter Ecstatic, Finally Freed Of "Worst President Ever" Label

Dick, Bush, And Colin: Fifth Graders, World-Leaders Laugh Hysterically At leaders' Combined Name Humor

Back to Top

Editorial

Point: Is There Anything We Weren't Right About?

Feedback - Have Republicans found any fault with Bush's Iraq policy yet?

Did The President Lie About WMD's?

Letters

The Idea of a “Moderate Independent” News Source

Bush's Greatest Success To Date:  Not Getting UN Support for the Iraq War

Back to Top

Media Watch

ABC News' George Will Calls Vermont Communist

Debunking The Media: Man Kills 2 With Samurai Sword, Right Wing Rushes to Profit Off Of Corpses

Debunking The Media: The Confused, Psychotic Defining of "Conservative"

Debunking The Media: Texas Republicans Use Homeland Security Dept. To Try And Locate President Bush's Morals

Did Someone Actually Say "Liar"?

Right-Wing Commentators Distraught Murdoch Can't Buy Whole Internet

AM Radio Host Debate a Disaster

Australian-Owned Fox News, USA Today, NY Post Push "True American Agenda"

Axis of Murdoch Decides Who To Occupy Next

Back to Top

Arts/Entertainment

American Artists Vow To Continue Expressing Nothing Through Their Work

Dixie Chicks Treated With Southern Courtesy and Respect

Back to Top

Elections 2004

Make No Mistake, For One Party The Election Has Already Begun

Dean In Charge

Rating The Dems On The Issues

The Moderate Independent Rates The Democratic Hopefuls Based On How Moderate And Independent They Are

Back to Top

Historical

George Pissed About French Interference With War

The History Of The 1st Amendment

Back to Top

World

Fashion Critics Doubt Lula's New Look For Real

Northrop, Occidental To Sponsor Shakira's Columbian Tour

Powerful French, German, Russian Alliance Shows Strength By Letting US Occupy Iraq, Take Its Oil

Back to Top

Awards

Coming Out Of The Closet Award: Country Music's Integrity On Display

Back to Top

Polls

Rating the War on Terror

Thoughts On Speaking Out During a War

Has President Bush Kept His Promise To Be A Uniter, Not A Divider

Back to Top

MAIN PAGE