July 16, 2008

VOL. 6 ISSUE JULY

 

 

LET'S GET SOMETHING STRAIGHT:  THE REAL STORY ABOUT IRAQ

As We Descend Into a Third Election Where Iraq Will Be a Large Focus

It's Vital To Remember What The Real Situation Is

 

by

John S. Ashton

 

 

July 16, 2008  Here we go again.

 

Today, wonderful headlines about Obama vs. McCain on Iraq.  The primaries centered around Iraq, Iraq, and then the economy a little toward the end.  Heck, the massive mortgage crisis didn't exist in anyone's mind or policies when until about half way through the primaries (even though the looming situation was obvious to M/I.)

 

If you visit John McCain's campaign website today, under the "News" section, here are the headlines:

07.15

 

John McCain's Comprehensive Strategy for Victory in Afghanistan

07.15

 

McC Rips O Timetable For 'Defeat'

07.15

 

ICYMI: "Planning To Ignore The Facts"

07.14

 

Remarks by John McCain at the 2008 National Council of La Raza Convention

07.14

 

Myth vs. Fact: Barack Obama's Iraq Op-Ed

Notice anything?

 

Yes, Iraq, Iraq, and, oh, look, more war, Afghanistan.

 

A while back M/I reviewed Newt Gingrich's latest book.  One of the most interesting parts of it was when he talked about his take on the War on Terror.  He didn't say it had to be smart.  He didn't say strong, successful.  No, what he said is it had to be "long."

 

If you recall the "rollout" of Iraq as an issue, it was specifically timed to coincide with the 2002 mid-term elections.  Specifically, it was the week before the election that George W. Bush told the UN it had to pass the Iraq resolution.  The week before.

 

In fact, let's look at what John McCain told us from the Senate floor in 2002 - October 2002, that is, just weeks before the election, as seen on this video of his speech on the Senate floor from October 2002.  McCain jumped on the bandwagon and called Saddam a "clear and present danger" who had "his weapons of mass destruction in tact... the interaction we believe to have occurred between members of al Queda and members of Saddam's regime may increasingly take the form of active cooperation to target the United States...  Saddam Hussein unquestionably has strong incentives to cooperate with al Queda."

 

Democratic attempts to make the sagging economy and health care the focus of the electionn were squashed.

 

Flash forward two years, to the 2004 election.  No one should ever forget what happened in the weeks before that election.  It has become a mantra at M/I:  never forget Fallujah.  The GOP rolled out a pending attack on Fallujah that, we were told in the last weeks before the election, would "break the back of the insurgency."  It was to be carried out right after the elction.  George Bush had to be re-elected or else this assault wouldn't happen and the insurgency wouldn't have it's back broken.  In addition to costing American lives by making the assault so public (see NEVER FORGET FALLJUAH), there's the bigger picture.

 

You see, Iraq was not just entered into for oil.  It was not just entered into to avenge Saddam.

 

The Iraq War, since before it was even launched, was set to be undertaken and sustained for one main reason beyond all:  because Republicans wanted to restore a war setting, like had existed during the Cold War, because they felt they could use it to win elections.

 

Flash forward now to 2008.  Things we know:  there was never any justified reason for invading Iraq.  This war was pushed with fraud and propaganda - which, as can be seen in the above video, John McCain was central to.  It has dominated 3 straight elections, and now the non-M/I media and GOP are trying to make it center again.

 

Today on CNN, and in other places on the media, they are starting to hammer away.  Obama didn't support "The Surge."  McCain did.  McCain was showed better judgement.

 

A few days back:  Obama is altering his position on Iraq.

 

Will he talk to generals?  We he alter his timetable?  Is victory now in sight thanks to "The Surge"?

 

The reality is, Obama should refuse to spend five seconds talking about Iraq.  Iraq was undertaken to create a distracting election issue.  He was right on to call it a distraction today, not just from Afghanistan, but from the economy, Global Warming, the national infrastructure, education.

 

John McCain is asserting - as is the non-M/I media - that some sort of "victory" is possible in Iraq, and more likely now because of "The Surge."

 

The reality is, that more than half a trillion dollars - and still a billion a day - thousands of American lives, and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilian lives, and three elections, and countless other hours of national discussion that should have been focused on actual issues, have all been lost to a war that never had any reason and which was only undertaken under the false premises told to us by, as we see come from his own mouth, John McCain.

 

Not one more minute should be wasted talking about Iraq.  The situation is simple - there was no threat.  There is no excuse for continuing another day.  We've lost billions and billions and thousands and thousands of lives.  There's nothing to say.  It's over, and it's not a legitimate topic of discussion.  Iraq and anything to do with it is just a GOP manufactured intentional distraction from actual issues.  And as Obama has said, all that is left to do now is set the mission to end the nonsense and carry out that mission.

 

More violence, less violence.  Agreements, no agreements.  America is crumbling around us.  And all of us be damned if we tolerate another election where this fake, manufactured subject is given time and attention.

 

Since 2002, John McCain took to lying to America about Iraq to aid GOP election chances.  It is time we take this subject off the table.  It is not legitimate.  And John McCain can be seen on video as just another liar who pushed this unjustified war, and still seeks to milk it to distract from the fact he has voted for the policies that have our nation crumbling.

 

John McCain trumpeted all of the lies the Bush administration used to sell the war.  He said Saddam's WMD's were 'in tact."  That there were ties to al Queda.  And that these things made him a "clear and present danger."

 

And as for how John McCain should be judged for his role in needlessly causing the death of thousands of American soldiers, let's hear John say it in his own words, again from the video:

 

"By voting to give the President the ability to wage war, we assume and share his responsibility for the war's outcome... we have a choice - the men and women who wear the uniform of our country, and might lose their lives in service to our cause do not... we have the responsibility to these men and women to judge responsibly...when we call them to serve, they will make us proud... we should make them proud by showing by showing deliberation, judgment, and statesmanship in the debate that will determine their mission..."

 

John McCain now dares to question Barack Obama's judgment.  He tries to say supporting a "Surge" five years into the war shows he has better judgment.

 

John has the blood of our soldiers at his feet.  By his own admission, he had "the responsibility to these men and women to judge responsibly."  Instead, he echoed lies.  He took their lives in doing so.

 

This topic should be entirely off the table.  As should John McCain as a credible candidate.

 

 

MAIN PAGE